I published a post with the experience of Emanuele , Luciano and I did notice that I was ready to agree fully with those who write (correctly) against the new SSP and avoid engaging the substance of what was written even before a simple sum wrong. Here I am again, to apologize for my lack of clarification and to publish the response received by Emanuele (thanks): _________________________
Dear Alessandra,
not respond to the spirit of controversy, but because it seems only right to apologize for being was inaccurate in my previous email in which I wrote the figures cast in memory.
now shows the figures from documents:
In two years (August 2008 - luglio2010):
KW = 7681 products (with a contribution of which are potentially € 0.44 € 3379) ;
withdrawn from the network KW = 5250 (and paid the bills amounted to € 1009)
the money credited to the account are € 3682 (including all contributions and ssp)
the money saved on utility bills have estimated that fail, for two years, the 300 € (the first since the plant was not paying more than € 650 years = € 1300 in two years) .
In conclusion in his pocket, after two years, have returned about € 4000 (€ 3682 + € 300 for savings on bills = € 4000 approx)
The estimate turns out that I did when I decided to make the plant was to receive (Always referring to two years) for € 3400 € 1200 + kw products of bills that I thought to save (since I produce a little 'more than they eat) = € 4600 approx.
€ 2300 / year can offset the cost of the system in nine years
€ 2000 / year it takes 11, then 2 more expected.
I'm not here to wrap it in calculations of lost interest € 21,500 for the installation, unless the interests of the contributions that I receive each year, plus interest lost on all the bills I pay every two months and I will be refunded (with the smaller amount etc etc as stated in the standard) also fraudulently after a year and a half anyway, even if it's pennies, do not just re inc ... (and the estimate does not even put the drive will not say that all I live for 20 years and prior to the plant not I knew, but this is my fault).
Add the years of life that is essentially cost me first to approve the agreement, to approve the new agreement, recommended sending a burst on a Pilduski (which is who I am Pilduski?) to do two DIA because the first was rejected by the city despite repeated meetings with surveying and engineering department (and if this is not the fault of the ENEL or GSE is always a person in my personal accounts), to understand how the portal of GSE, get answers from the toll of GSE (even after waiting for my turn, I was 27 degrees, I had time to wash the car), surfing the Internet to see if I was the only fool discontent or if there were others like me (and that's how I found your blog) and here is that the solar panel cost me at least 3 years more than the estimated (2 years of lost revenue and at least one year of health).
I apologize again for the vagueness of my previous post, I congratulate you on the civic and moral force that animates you, say hello to other visitors to the blog, but I will continue to advise all friends from falling into this quicksand of bureaucracy, the sun going to enjoy it in Sharm el Sheik, so now I shall not take away from the head that there is a large gain and even will not save the planet.
If you want you can also publish this paper (But first check the numbers).
hello
Emanuele
_________________
Thanks again Emma.
soon
Alessandra
0 comments:
Post a Comment